High School Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills on Static Fluid

Authors

  • Ivan Danar Aditya Irawan State University of Malang
  • Sarah Lutfiah Ardilla State University of Malang
  • Sayyidah Assadillah Almujaddid State University of Malang
  • A. Syafriyana State University of Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v9i1.4452

Keywords:

physics learning, scientific argumentation, static fluid

Abstract

The need to improve students' argumentation skills through phenomenology learning approaches encourages efforts to map scientific argumentation skills. the research aims to determine students' argumentation skills on static fluid. Qualitative research with survey method using questions about static fluid phenomena in everyday life. random sampling obtained 33 students from one of the State High Schools in Malang Regency as samples in the study. Data were analyzed by mapping the level of scientific argumentation skills. The results showed that students' argumentation skills were spread from level 1 to level 4 with the majority at level 2. At this level, students are generally able to provide claims consisting of data and reasoning. This achievement shows that students' scientific argumentation skills are relatively low. Future research can design innovative models and media to improve students' scientific argumentation skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ivan Danar Aditya Irawan, State University of Malang

    Departement of Physics, State University of Malang

  • Sarah Lutfiah Ardilla , State University of Malang

    Departement of Physics, State University of Malang

  • Sayyidah Assadillah Almujaddid, State University of Malang

    Departement of Physics, State University of Malang

  • A. Syafriyana, State University of Malang

    Departement of Physics, State University of Malang

References

Adisna, Q. D. P. P., Wahuni, A., & Suyudi, A. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Fluida Statis. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 3(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v3i2.4632

Al-Ajm, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022). The Level of Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Subject among Grade 11th Students: The Role of Logical Thinking. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7

Amielia, S. D., Suciati, S., & Maridi, M. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Argumentation Skill Using an Argument Driven Inquiry-Based Module. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8042

Anwar, Y., Rahmayanti, R., & Ermayanti. (2021). Biodiversity with problem-based learning: impact on quality of students’ scientific argumentation. Biosfer, 14(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.14133

Candido, K. J. O., Capilitan, L. B., Gillesania, K. C. C., Silva, N., & Reales, J. M. B. (2023). Learning Physics in the Blended Learning mode: Input for Enhanced Strategies in Learning Physics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(3), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.03.10

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Estianinur, Parno, P., Latifah, E., & Ali, M. (2021). Exploration of students’ conceptual understanding in static fluid through experiential learning integrated STEM with formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043129

Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Wiyanto, W., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2001

Iordanou, K. (2022). Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: the role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09289-1

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593

Khusnayain, A. (2017). Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa berbasis Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk menumbuhkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah. digilib.unila.ac.id.

Maidiana, M. (2021). Penelitian Survey. ALACRITY : Journal of Education, 1(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v1i2.23

Mellenia, R. P. A., & Admoko, S. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248

Mete, P. (2023). Argumentation Skills of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers on Atmospheric Pressure. Journal of Science Learning, 6(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i1.46644

Mikeska, J. N., & Howell, H. (2020). Simulations as practice-based spaces to support elementary teachers in learning how to facilitate argumentation-focused science discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1356–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21659

Mufidah, J., Parno, P., & Diantoro, M. (2020). Penguasaan Konsep Siswa dalam Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Fenomena Disertai Penilaian Formatif. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 5(4), 749–761. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant

Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471

Mutmainnah, N., Lisatullaeli, L., Izzati, N., Ulfaunnisah, U., & Jaelani, Z. A. (2025). Peran Logika Untuk Membangun Kemampuan Siswa SMPN 2 Labuapi Dalam Berpikir Kritis. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 90–105.

Naviri, S., Sumaryanti, S., & Paryadi, P. (2021). Explanatory Learning Research: Problem-Based Learning or Project-Based Learning? Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 61(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.2478/afepuc-2021-0010

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2

Novianti, S., Sari, L. Y., & Afza, A. (2022). Factors Caused Difficulty in Learning IPA for Students. Journal Of Biology Education Research, 3(2), 50–59. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jber

Pujianto, D., Nopiyanto, Y. E., Syafrial, S., & Insanistyo, B. (2023). Improving the Scientific Argumentation Skills of Physical Education Students Through the Argument Driven Inquiry Learning Model. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(1), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i1.24291

Putra, D. S., & Hidayusa, W. O. (2019). Analisis Sikap Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMA Ferdy Ferry Putra Kota Jambi. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(3), 299–311.

Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi argumentasi ilmiah dalam pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56–66.

Siahaan, K. W. A., Lumbangaol, S. T. P., Marbun, J., Nainggolan, A. D., Ritonga, J. M., & Barus, D. P. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Multi Representasi terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.614

Sulisworo, D., & Safitri, I. (2022). Online Student-worksheet Based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern in Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2394(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2394/1/012033

Susana, E., Suryani, L., Rahmawati, S., Sudarto, S., & Gozali, A. A. (2023). Tinjauan Perspektif Taxonomy Bloom Terhadap Model Pembelajaran HOTS dalam Literasi Sains. SELING Jurnal Program Studi PGRA, 9(2), 255–267.

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1364–1372.

Wardani, D. A. W. (2023). Problem Based Learning: Membuka Peluang Kolaborasi dan Pengembangan Skill Siswa. Jawa Dwipa Jurnal Penelitian Dan Penjaminan Mutu, 4(1), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

High School Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills on Static Fluid. (2025). JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 9(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v9i1.4452

Similar Articles

1-10 of 77

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.