Learning Management System Acceptance Rate Among Vocational School Physics’ Student

Authors

  • Ety Dwiastuti Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Moh. Irma Sukarelawan Universitas Ahmad Dahlan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-3964
  • Sriyanto Sriyanto Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 2 Bantul, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v6i1.1183

Keywords:

Learning management systems, LMSAS, Rasch Model, Acceptance of LMS

Abstract

Learning management systems (LMS) have become a key component of teaching and learning in schools. However, the evaluation of student acceptance rates on its implementation so far has not been widely reported. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the acceptance rate of LMS among students in terms of gender and grade level. The level of student acceptance of the LMS in administration through an online survey using Google forms. A total of 141 students who took physics subjects from class XI and XII, one of the vocational high schools were involved. Acceptance of the LMS uses a 21-item LMSAS (Learning Management System Acceptability Scale) developed by Sezer and Yilmaz in 2019. The LMSAS uses a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). LMS acceptance components include Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Facilitating Condition (FC), and Social Influence (SI). Wright map and Logit Value of Person (LVP) were used to assess LMS acceptance among students. The analysis results show that student acceptance of the LMS is distributed chiefly at a good level of acceptance. As many as 84% of students received the LMS. Based on gender, 65% of male students are quite accepting of the LMS. Based on class, class XII students are more dominant (35.5%) receiving LMS. Thus, most students in public vocational high schools welcome the LMS well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ety Dwiastuti, Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 2 Yogyakarta

References

Adams, D., Joo, M. T. H., Sumintono, B., & Pei, O. S. (2020). Blended Learning Engagement in Public and Private Higher Education Institutions: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of Students’ Backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6

Ardiyanti, D. (2017). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.17801

Bakri, F., & Muliyati, D. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat E-Learning Untuk Matakuliah Fisika Dasar Ii Menggunakan Lms Chamilo. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i1.4868

Barbera, E., Clara, M., & Linder-Vanberschot, J. A. (2013). Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Online Courses. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.3.226

Handayani, N. L., Sulisworo, D., & Ishafit, I. (2021). Pemanfaatan Google Classroom pada Pembelajaran IPA Fisika Jarak Jauh untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v9i1.3521

Husain, S. A. (2022). The Effectiveness of CANVAS Learning Management System for Teaching Undergraduate Mathematics During COVID-19 Pandemic (pp. 53–59). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79614-3_6

Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the Right Learning Management System (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644

Khairani, A., Daud, A., & Adnan, M. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the Use of Google Classroom As a Platform in Blended Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i1.193

Khunaini, N., & Sholikhah, N. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Learning Management System Google Classroom dan Gaya Mengajar Guru terhadap Motivasi Belajar pada Pembelajaran Daring. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2079–2090.

Kite, J., Schlub, T. E., Zhang, Y., Choi, S., Craske, S., & Dickson, M. (2020). Exploring lecturer and student perceptions and use of a learning management system in a postgraduate public health environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020909217

Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, H.-S. (2014). Associated Factors which Influence Satisfaction of Students on Web-based University Courses using a Structural Equation Model. Information (Japan), 17(10(B)), 5211–5218.

Lestari, F. F. S., Hamdan, M., & Susilawati. (2021). Studi Literatur Keefektifan Kelas Virtual dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Fisika (JPIF), 1(1), 29–32.

Ling Lee, W., Chinna, K., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Psychometrics assessment of HeartQoL questionnaire: A rasch analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2047487320902322. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320902322

Maryam, E. (2021). Penggunaan Layanan Aplikasi Google Classroom Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Mahamahasiswa Universitas Bina Insan. Journal of Education and Culture, 1(1), 1–7.

Mthethwa-Kunene, K. E., & Maphosa, C. (2020). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Utilisation of Moodle Learning Management System by Open and Distance Learning Students at the University of Eswatini. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.20448/801.51.17.32

Nupura, M. S., Mursalin, M., & Arbie, A. (2021). Pengaruh Whatsapp Berbasis Google Classroom dan Google Meet dengan Implementasi Model Inquiry Learning dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jambura Physics Journal, 3(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.34312/jpj.v3i1.9788

Papini, N., Kang, M., Ryu, S., Griese, E., Wingert, T., & Herrmann, S. (2020). Rasch calibration of the 25-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(11), 1976–1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320904769

Purnami, W., Ashadi, Suranto, Sarwanto, Sumintono, B., & Wahyu, Y. (2021). Investigation of person ability and item fit instruments of eco critical thinking skills in basic science concept materials for elementary pre-service teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.25239

Rakhmawati, N. I. S., Mardliyah, S., Fitri, R., Darni, D., & Laksono, K. (2021). Pengembangan Learning Management System (LMS) di Era Pandemi Covid-19 pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i1.991

Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421

Rusdin, M. E., Widodo, W., & Maruto, G. (2020). Implementation Cooperative Learning Type STAD Assisted Edmodo in Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Indonesian Review of Physics, 3(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v3i1.1766

Sezer, B., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Learning management system acceptance scale (LMSAS): A validity and reliability study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3959

Sukarelawan, M. I., & Gustina, E. (2021). Penelitian Alternatif di Masa Pandemi Bagi Guru Fisika: Implementasi Model Rasch dalam Penelitian Survei. In D. Sulisworo (Ed.), Dinamika Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Masa Pandemi (pp. 189–195). Markumi Press.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial [Rasch model application for social sciences research]. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Asesmen Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Susilawati, S., Ishafit, I., & Setyawati, E. (2019). Development Student Worksheet in the Topic of Regular Circular Motion with Blended Learning based Edmodo as Learning Motivations for Student. Indonesian Review of Physics, 2(2), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v2i2.1006

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wiratomo, Y., & Mulyatna, F. (2020). Use of Learning Management Systems in Mathematics Learning during a Pandemic. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP), 1(2), 62–71.

Yauma, A., Fitri, I., & Ningsih, S. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) pada E-Learning Menggunakan Metode Agile dan Waterfall berbasis Website. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 5(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v5i3.190

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Dwiastuti, E., Sukarelawan, M. I., & Sriyanto, S. (2022). Learning Management System Acceptance Rate Among Vocational School Physics’ Student. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 6(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v6i1.1183

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract Views: 190 | File Views: 143

Most read articles by the same author(s)