Content Validity of Augmented Reality Flashcards on Fluid Dynamics Material Using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio and an Integrated Approach

Authors

  • Mutiara Putri Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Hamdi Akhsan Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Sardianto Markos Siahaan Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Leni Marlina Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30599/7vqrzc10

Keywords:

Content Validity Ratio (Cvr), Augmented Reality Flashcards, Fluid Dynamics, Instrument Validation, Physics Education; Educational Technology

Abstract

This study evaluates the content validity of Augmented Reality (AR) flashcards for teaching Fluid Dynamics using a mixed-methods approach. Ten physics experts assessed 50 items across five dimensions. Validity was measured using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio (CVR; threshold ≥0.80), Gwet’s AC1 for inter-rater agreement, and bootstrap sensitivity analysis. All items met statistical validity criteria: 92% achieved perfect agreement (CVR = 1.00) and 8% met the threshold (CVR = 0.80). The overall mean CVR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00), with Gwet’s AC1 = 0.98, indicating excellent expert consensus. Sensitivity analysis confirmed result stability despite the limited panel. Qualitative feedback guided iterative improvements to visual design and equation annotations. The instrument demonstrates robust, methodologically sound content validity and is highly suitable for evaluating immersive physics learning tools. The combined CVR, AC1, and sensitivity framework is recommended as a standard for validating technology-enhanced educational media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah Aulia Zayrin, Hayatun Nupus, Khalista Khansa Maizia, Siska Marsela, Rully Hidayatullah, & Harmonedi, H. (2025). Analisis Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan (Uji Validitas Dan Relibilitas Instrumen Penelitian). Jurnal QOSIM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 3(2), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i2.1070

Amelia, M., & Nasution, B. (2025). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Video Powtoon pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi di Sma Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v13i2.60914

Arifta Nurjanah, Endah Retnowati; Augmented reality in the perspective of cognitive load theory. AIP Conf. Proc. 29 April 2024; 2622 (1): 090002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134796

Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808

Bhakti, Y. B., Arthur, R., & Supriyati, Y. (2023). Development of an assessment instrument for critical thinking skills in Physics: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012067

Dewi, P.S., & Kuswanto, H. (2023). The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality-assisted physics e-module based on pedicab to improve mathematical communication and critical thinking abilities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1714

Erlangga, S. Y., Setyawan, D. N., Wijayanti, A., Winingsih, P. H., & Poort, E. A. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking in Thermodynamics through Long Bumbung Local Wisdom-Based Physics Comics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 13(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v13i1.17872

López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., Lampropoulos, G., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2022). Design and validation of a questionnaire for the evaluation of educational experiences in the metaverse in Spanish students (METAEDU). Heliyon, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11364

Markos Siahaan, S., Astra Patriot, E., Scristia, S., Helen, H., Kalsum, U., & Elsa Putri, R. (2023). The Validity and Practicality of Augmented Reality-Based Media Development on Science Matter. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 24(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i4.pp717-729

Nabilah, N., Sari, S. D. P., & Sari, Y. M. (2025). Developing and Validating MCA-Equivalent Summative Assessment in Combinatorics Using Aiken’s V Method. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v8i2.5222

Nisrina, N., Rahmawati, I., & Hikmah, F. N. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Validasi Produk Multimedia Pembelajaran Fisika. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 10(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v10i1.5278

Ridwan, M. R., Istiyono, E., & Widihastuti, W. (2021). Test Items Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability using a Classical Test Theory Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 22(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v22i1.pp98-111

Romero Jeldres, M., Díaz Costa, E., & Faouzi Nadim, T. (2023). A review of Lawshe’s method for calculating content validity in the social sciences. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1271335

Roy, R., Sukumar, G. M., Philip, M., & Gopalakrishna, G. (2023). Face, content, criterion and construct validity assessment of a newly developed tool to assess and classify work–related stress (TAWS– 16). PLoS ONE, 18(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280189

Sarnita, F., Budi Adnyana, P., Rapi, N. K., Taman, S., & Bima, S. (2025). Uji Validitas dan Reliabelitas Instrumen Literasi Numerasi Materi Tata Surya untuk Siswa Tunanetra. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JP-IPA), (02). https://doi.org/10.56842/jp-ipa

Setiawan, R., Wagiran, W., & Alsamiri, Y. (2024). Construction of an instrument for evaluating the teaching process in higher education: Content and construct validity. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.63483

Slater, P., & Hasson, F. (2025). Quantitative Research Designs, Hierarchy of Evidence and Validity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(3), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13135

Tiara Ganish, S., Subali Jurusan Fisika, B., & Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, F. (2025). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Fluida Dinamis Berbasis Scratch untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik. In Unnes Physics Education Journal Terakreditasi SINTA (Vol. 14, Number 3). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej

Wahyu Prananto, I., Rakhmawati, Y., Pamungkas, T., Negeri Yogyakarta, U., & Riau Kepulauan, U. (2022). Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Mathematics Learning Independence Instruments. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 6. https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.6.2.116-132

Yusuf, A., Suardana, I. N., & Selamet, K. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Flashcard IPA SMP Materi Tata Surya. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 4(1), 12.

Zavira, N., & Sari, S. Y. (2023). Validitas Instrumen Aktivitas Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. ARZUSIN, 3(6), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v3i6.1940

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

Content Validity of Augmented Reality Flashcards on Fluid Dynamics Material Using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio and an Integrated Approach. (2026). Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 18(02), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.30599/7vqrzc10
  Abstract Views: 15 |   File Views: 6