Students’ Perception of Technology Affordance on AI-Based Feedback for Academic Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30599/zgcqbd91Keywords:
Academic Writing, AI-based feedback, Artificial intelligence, Students' perception, Technology affordanceAbstract
This study explores undergraduate students’ perceptions of the technological affordances of AI-based feedback in academic writing from the perspective of Gibson’s affordance theory. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological approach involving semi-structured interviews with five purposively selected undergraduate students. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings identified six technological affordances representing key dimensions of students’ experiences with AI-based feedback. Together, these affordances supported students throughout the writing process by improving accessibility, revision practices, communication, and the effective use of AI technologies. However, participants also reported several challenges, including exessive reliance on AI, limited access to premium features, and concerns about data privacy. This study contributes to the growing body of research on AI-based feedback in higher education by demonstrating how technological affordances shape students’ academic writing experiences and support more effective writing practices.
Downloads
References
Alonzo, D., Abril, J. M. V., & Zin Oo, C. (2024). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Assessment: Empirical Evidence and Future Directions. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4695394
Amanda, Elsa Muliani Sukma, Nursyahrina Lubis, & Utami Dewi. (2023). Quillbot As An AI-powered English Writing Assistant: An Alternative For Students to Write English. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026
Arizena, M. S. , &, & Mayasari, D. M. ,. (2021). PARAPHRASING STRATEGY IN EFL LEARNERS’ READING SKILL.
Ayodeji Oseni, Nour Moustafa, Peng Liu, Zahir Tari, & Athanasios Vasilakos. (2020). Security and Privacy for Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the ACM, 37(4), 1–35.
Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), 223.
Celik, I., Gedrimiene, E., Siklander, S., & Muukkonen, H. (2024). The affordances of artificial intelligence-based tools for supporting 21st-century skills: A systematic review of empirical research in higher education. In Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 2024, Number 3).
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chen, Q. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580
Devineni, S. K. (2024). Cite this Article: Siva Karthik Devineni, AI in Data Privacy and Security. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning (IJAIML), 3(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WCN8A
Dewi, U. (2022). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students’ Perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315
Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v4i2.1188
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
Hall, R. (2024). Generative AI and re-weaving a pedagogical horizon of social possibility. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00445-6
Ismailia, T., & Novawan, A. (2025). Enhancing EFL Students’ Recount Writing: A Comparative Analysis of Grammarly, QuillBot, and GrammarCheck Applications. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication JEAPCO, 11(2), 2025. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v11i2.5095
Jeanjaroonsri, R. (2023). Thai EFL Learners’ Use and Perceptions of Mobile Technologies for Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 169–193. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/263438
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Liao, M., Zhu, K., & Wang, G. (2024). Can human-machine feedback in a smart learning environment enhance learners’ learning performance? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288503
Maulidina, P., & Wibowo, H. (2022). THE USE OF GRAMMARLY TOOLS TO ENRICH STUDENT’S WRITING ABILITY. Lingua, 18(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246
Mira, A. S., & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students’ Paraphrased Texts and Their Perceptions of Paraphrasing in Academic Writing. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 14(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v14i1.108732
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Nykyporets, S. S. (2023). HARNESSING CLOUD TECHNOLOGIES FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AMONG MASTERS IN ENERGY ENGINEERING. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-
ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Paracha, A., Arshad, J., Farah, M. B., & Ismail, K. (2024). Machine learning security and privacy: a review of threats and countermeasures. EURASIP Journal on Information Security, 2024(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-024-00158-3
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
Sulistyaningrum, S. D. (2021). Utilizing Online Paraphrasing Tools to Overcome Students’ Paraphrasing Difficulties in Literature Reviews. Journal of English Language Studies, 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v6i2.11582
Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing Class: A Focus on Indonesian University Students’ Perceptions. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882
Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: a case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113
Xuyen, N. T. (2023). Using the Online Paraphrasing Tool Quillbot to Assist Students in Paraphrasing the Source Information: English-majored Students’ Perceptions. 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.150.3
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zhao, X. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL Writers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 890–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Della Setiya Maharani, Dangin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




