Hegemonic Masculinity Analysis in Extra Joss Ultimate Advertisement

Authors

  • Kamal Abdul Azis Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Dr. Widya Nirmalawati, S.S., M.A Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30599/d8drm940

Keywords:

Extra Joss Ultimate, Gender Representation, Hegemonic Masculinity, Peirce Semiotics, Television Advertising.

Abstract

Advertising is a strategic medium in shaping and reproducing social construction, including gender representation. This research aims to reveal the representation of hegemonic masculinity in Extra Joss Ultimate energy drink advertisements using Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotic analysis and R.W. Connell's theory of hegemonic masculinity. Advertisements are analyzed not only as commercial messengers but also shape and reproducing social constructions, especially gender ideology. Data was obtained from one 30-second video ad divided into five main scenes. The analysis was conducted by identifying icons, indices, and symbols in visual, verbal, and audio elements and associating them with hegemonic masculinity structures such as physical strength, competitiveness, and male dominance. The results show that Extra Joss advertisements represent men as strong, fearless, complacent, and passionate, while feminine values or alternative masculinities are almost eliminated. The sign system used reinforces patriarchal ideology through naturalizing masculine symbols as natural and ideal. Thus, advertising functions not only as a promotional tool but also as a medium for producing meaning that perpetuates gender inequality in the public sphere. The findings contribute to media and gender studies, opening up space for critical readings of male representation in Indonesian popular culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astuti, A., & Ardi, A. (2018). A Discourse Analysis of Hegemonic Masculinity on TV Advertisements. Jurnal JILP: Langue and Parole, 2(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2404979

Brickell, C. (2022). Goffman and Gender Studies. In M. Jacobsen & G. Smith (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Goffman Studies (pp. 264–275). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160861-25

Buschmeyer, A., & Lengersdorf, D. (2016). The Differentiation of Masculinity as a Challenge for the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity. NORMA, 11(3), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2016.1217672

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. University of California Press.

Curone-Prieto, R., Parra-Casado, D., & Vives-Cases, C. (2023). Hegemonic Masculinities and Femininities in Food Industry Packaging. Feminist Media Studies, 238, 4203–4220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2158897

Das, P., & Majhi, M. (2022). Gender Role Portrayal in Indian Advertisement: A Review. 19th International Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, HWWE 2021, 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94277-9_40

Fedorenko, O. (2015). Politics of sex appeal in advertising: Female creatives and post-feminist sensibility in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies, 15(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.930060

Hamel, S. C. (2011). Semiotics: Theory and Applications. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Jha, A., Raj, A., & Gangwar, D. (2017). A Semiotic Analysis of Portraying Gender in Magazine Advertisements. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 22(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2205110108

Mahabir, K. (2021). The Marginalization of Indian Men in Advertisements in Trinidad and Tobago. In B. Samaroo, P. Gooptar, & K. Mahabir (Eds.), Global Indian Diaspora (pp. 165–178). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246060-11

Middleton, K., & Turnbull, S. (2021). How advertising got ‘woke’: The institutional role of advertising in the emergence of gender progressive market logics and practices. Marketing Theory, 21(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931211035163

Nirmalawati, W. (2008). Semiotika Horror dalam Poster Film. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v2i2.2249

Peirce, C. S. (1986). Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs (R. E. Innis, Ed.). Hutchinson University Press.

Potter, T. (2024). Comedy and Masculine Hegemony: Adapting Masculinities in Humorous Children’s Fiction. Children’s Literature in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-024-09595-7

Prabowo, G., & Fitriani, N. (2024). Contemporary Shifting of Masculinity Concept in Advertising. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 18(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.24090.komunika.v18i1.7930

Sukmadinata, & Syaodih, N. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Winata, I. N. (2012). Hegemoni Maskulinitas dalam Iklan Minuman Berenergi (Analisis Semiotika TYC Extra Joss dan Kuku Bima Ener-G). Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi, 3(1), 42–49.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-26

How to Cite

Hegemonic Masculinity Analysis in Extra Joss Ultimate Advertisement. (2026). Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 10(2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.30599/d8drm940
  Abstract Views: 531 |   File Views: 289