The Cultural Pluralism Reflected in Language Choice (A case study of Girl dormitory of Nurul Huda)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v6i2.1308Keywords:
Language Choice, Girl Dormitory, CommunicationAbstract
This study aims to find out the language choice that is used by students (santri) in the girl dormitory (asrama putri)Nurul Huda Sukaraja OKU Timur and factors that support using these languages. This study is an ethnography that belongs to qualitative research. In this study, the researcher has a role as an instrument to collect the data. The data are collected through observation and field notes toward utterances produced by students in their daily life communication. The result shows that there are some kinds of language used by students in the girl dormitory. They are standard Indonesian and nonstandard Indonesian language, Javanese kromo and Javanese ngoko and Komering. Each language has its situation to be used by all students. And most of the students use nonstandard Indonesian and Javanese ngoko in most of the daily life communication.
Downloads
References
Bader Sa'idDweik, Hanadi A Qawar, Language Choice and Language Attitude in A Multilingual Arab Canadian Community: Quebec-Canada, A Sociolinguistic Study, 2015. UK: British Journal of English Linguistic.
Coulmas, Florian. 2005. Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers' Choices. Cambridge University Press
David, M., K. (2006). Language choice in Sindhi families. In M.K. David (Ed.), Language choices and discourse of Malaysian families: Case studies of families in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 3-21. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information andResearch Development Centre
Dewi, U. P., &Setiadi, C. J. 2018. Language attitude and language choice in the bilingual academic learning environment. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 369-373.https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4288
Dumanig, Francisco Perlas. 2010. Language Choice in Interracial Marriages: The Case of Filipino-Malaysian Couples. USA: Universal-Publishers.
Ferrer, C. &Sankoff, D. (2004). The Valencian revival: Why usage lags behind competence.Language in Society, 33 (1), 1-31.
Pillai, S. 2006. Malaysian English as a first language. In David, K. (Ed.). Language choices and discourse of Malaysian families: Case studies of families in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (pp. 61-75). Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and ResearchDevelopment Centre.
Holmes, Janet. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic, 4th edition. New York: Rouledge
Lee Mei, Tam., Nadzimah Abdullah, A., Swee Heng, C., & Binti Mohd Kasim, Z. 2016. Language Choice and Use of Malaysian Public University Lecturers in the Education Domain. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 21-32. Retrieved from https://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/1953
Myers-Scotton, C. &Bolonyai, A. (2001). Calculating Speakers: Codeswitching in a Rational Choice Model. Language in Society 30, 1-28.
Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wardaugh, Ronald, Fuller, M.Janet. 2015. An introduction to sociolinguistic. 7th edition. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Wardaugh, Ronald. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic. 5th edition. Uk: Blackwell Publishing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 535
| 
File Views: 671
